She Has 47 Five-Star Reviews. She Has Never Done a Case.

She Has 47 Five-Star Reviews. She Has Never Done a Case.

Published by the International Institute of Medical Tattoo Science and Artistry | St. Petersburg, Florida

Five stars. Forty-seven of them. Glowing. Enthusiastic. Full of words like “professional,” “latest techniques,” “life-changing experience,” “highly recommend.”

And not a single one of them is about areola restoration.

This is one of the most common situations a student encounters when researching 3D areola restoration training programs — a trainer with an impressive review count, a polished website, a confident bio full of self-appointed titles, and a portfolio section that either does not exist, links to stock imagery, or shows work that has nothing to do with post-surgical paramedical tattooing. The reviews look real because they are real. They are just not about the thing being sold.

Understanding the difference between a real clinical reputation and a well-managed cosmetic tattoo reputation is one of the most important skills a student can develop before spending thousands of dollars on a training program. This article is going to teach you how to read reviews like a detective — and what to do when the portfolio tells a different story than the marketing.

Reviews Are Not Lies. They Are Just Not the Full Picture.

Nobody is accusing cosmetic tattoo artists of faking their reviews. A microblading specialist with 47 five-star reviews probably does exceptional brows. Those clients are genuinely happy. Those reviews are completely accurate descriptions of their experience. The problem is not that the reviews are dishonest — the problem is that they are being used to build credibility in a completely different clinical category.

When someone with 47 glowing reviews about eyebrows, lash enhancements, and lip blush pivots to teaching 3D areola nipple restoration, those reviews do not transfer. The skill set does not fully transfer. The clinical experience does not transfer. But the star rating does — and that is where the confusion lives.

A student searching for the best areola tattoo training in their area sees a trainer with dozens of five-star reviews and assumes that those reviews represent the full scope of the trainer’s work. They do not. They represent the scope of work those particular clients came in for. And if none of those clients came in for areola restoration, the reviews tell you nothing about the trainer’s competency in that area.

This is the sleight of hand. It is not always intentional. But it is always misleading.

What Real Areola Restoration Client Reviews Actually Sound Like

Once you know what to look for, real areola restoration client reviews are impossible to mistake for cosmetic PMU reviews. They are different in tone, in length, in specificity, and in emotional weight. Here is how to tell them apart.

Cosmetic tattoo reviews tend to be short and general. They mention the studio, the artist’s personality, the cleanliness of the space, the ease of booking. They use words like “professional,” “welcoming,” “talented,” and “highly recommend.” They might mention the procedure briefly — “got my brows done” or “love my new lips” — but the detail stops there. These reviews are about the experience of visiting a studio. They are not about a clinical outcome.

Areola restoration client reviews are different in every way. They are longer. They are detailed in a way that only comes from having gone through something significant. They mention the consultation — how the artist listened, how they explained the process, how they talked through placement and color. They describe the procedure itself, the healing timeline, what it looked like at six weeks. They talk about going back for a touch-up. And they almost always include something personal — what it felt like to look in the mirror afterward, what it meant to feel whole again, how it closed a chapter that surgery had opened.

These are not reviews about an ambiance. They are reviews about a transformation. And they are written by people who have been through something that most of us cannot fully imagine — mastectomy, reconstruction, radiation, years of medical treatment — and who found, at the end of that journey, an artist who could give them something back.

If a trainer’s reviews do not contain any of that — if you scroll through fifty reviews and cannot find a single one that mentions areola restoration, post-surgical work, breast reconstruction, or nipple tattooing — you have your answer. The reviews are real. The clinical expertise in this specific area has not been demonstrated.

How to Search Reviews the Right Way

Do not just look at the star rating. Do not just read the most recent three reviews. Go deeper. Here is how to search a trainer’s reviews with intention.

On Google, look for the search function within the reviews panel. Type the word “areola” and see what comes up. Try “nipple.” Try “mastectomy.” Try “reconstruction.” Try “breast cancer.” If none of those search terms return a single review, the trainer does not have a documented public reputation for this work. Full stop.

Then look at the distribution of services mentioned across all of their reviews. If 90% of the reviews mention brows, lips, lashes, or general PMU services, and less than 10% mention anything paramedical — that is not a paramedical specialist. That is a cosmetic tattoo artist who has added a paramedical menu item. The ratio tells the story.

Check their social media the same way. Search their Instagram for the word “areola” or look through their tagged posts. Look at their Facebook page and search for posts about breast cancer clients or post-surgical work. If the overwhelming majority of their content is brows, lips, and lash work with a few areola posts scattered in — that is a cosmetic artist dabbling in paramedical work. It is not a paramedical specialist with a cosmetic background. The direction matters.

The Portfolio Problem: When There Is Nothing to Show

An absent portfolio is not a neutral fact. It is information.

When a trainer markets themselves as an expert in 3D areola restoration and does not have a publicly available portfolio of their own clinical work, there are only a few possible explanations. They have not done enough cases to have a portfolio worth showing. They have done cases but the results are not at a standard they are confident displaying publicly. Or they are new to the work and are using a training certification to build their client base rather than building a client base before offering to train others.

None of these explanations are acceptable foundations for a training program. If a trainer cannot show you what their own hands have produced on real post-surgical clients, they cannot credibly teach you to do the same. There is no version of this where the absence of portfolio is fine.

Watch for these portfolio red flags. Stock imagery used in place of real client photos. Illustrations or 3D renders presented as examples of the work. Before-and-after photos of practice skin work rather than real clients. A gallery that shows cosmetic tattoo work — brows, lips, liner — with one or two areola photos included. A portfolio page that exists on the website but has no actual images in it. A trainer who says their client photos are private “out of respect for clients” as the complete explanation — without offering any alternative verification of their clinical work.

On the question of client privacy: yes, areola restoration clients deserve discretion. Legitimate trainers navigate this the same way legitimate surgeons do — they obtain proper consent, they photograph results professionally, and they build a portfolio that demonstrates their outcomes while protecting their clients’ identities. Many clients are proud of their results and choose to share them. Privacy is a consideration. It is not a reason to have zero documented clinical work.

What It Looks Like When Someone Has Nothing to Hide

Gemma Bowers is a medical tattoo artist based on the Isle of Wight in the United Kingdom. She is exactly what a trainer with nothing to hide looks like — and understanding why she looks that way makes it easier to recognize the contrast when you see it.

Gemma won Best Medical Tattoo Artist at the British Aesthetics Awards in 2020 and Medical Artist of the Year at the PMU Conference and Awards in 2022. Those are peer-judged, publicly documented awards. Not self-appointed titles. Not marketing copy. Awards given by the industry to someone the industry looked at and said: this work is exceptional.

She co-founded The Tata Foundation, a charity built specifically to fund free areola tattooing for breast cancer survivors who cannot afford the procedure. Think about what that means for a moment. She did not just add areola restoration to her service menu. She built an entire charitable organization around it because she believes this work is so important that financial barriers should not prevent access to it. That is not the behavior of someone dabbling. That is the behavior of someone who has built their professional identity around this mission.

Gemma’s before-and-after portfolio is publicly available. Her clinical work is documented and displayed. She talks about her cases openly. She educates about the procedure. She is part of the Mastectomy Tattooing Alliance. She co-runs The Areola Training Academy with Vikki Clark, whose own personal experience with breast cancer and mastectomy brings a depth of understanding to the training that cannot be manufactured.

None of this is hidden. None of it requires a student to take her word for it. The awards are verifiable. The charity is real and operational. The portfolio exists. The training reviews from students specifically describe learning areola restoration with live models and ongoing support after training ends. This is what transparency looks like in practice. This is what it looks like when a trainer has done the work and is not afraid to show it.

When you go looking for information about a trainer and everything you find confirms what they say about themselves — awards, charity work, portfolio, student reviews that describe clinical training — that is alignment. That is credibility. It is the opposite of a beautifully designed website with a review count that has nothing to do with the service being sold.

The Self-Appointed Title Problem

While you are reading reviews and looking at portfolios, pay attention to the language trainers use to describe themselves. Words like “world-renowned,” “master trainer,” “industry leader,” and “pioneer” are phrases anyone can type. They require no verification. They carry no external standard. They mean exactly as much as the person writing them decides they mean.

Real industry recognition comes from outside. It looks like peer-judged awards from organizations like the British Aesthetics Awards or the PMU Conference. It looks like SPCP certification or BUPA recognition. It looks like referral relationships with named plastic surgery practices. It looks like being listed in professional directories like the Mastectomy Tattooing Alliance. It looks like other respected practitioners in the field publicly referencing your work.

Self-description is marketing. External verification is credibility. Learn to tell the difference, and you will see through the noise immediately.

Why This Matters More Than It Might Seem

A student who trains with an underprepared trainer does not just get a substandard education. They get sent into clinical situations they are not equipped to handle. And the person on the receiving end of that unpreparedness is a woman who has already survived breast cancer. Who has already been through surgery, possibly radiation, possibly reconstruction that took years. Who came to a paramedical tattoo artist because she was told this could give her something back.

The chain from unverified trainer to underprepared student to vulnerable client is short and direct. Checking a portfolio is not bureaucracy. Reading reviews carefully is not paranoia. These are the minimum standards of due diligence that every student owes to the future clients they will sit across from.

The women who need this work done have already been through enough. They deserve artists who were trained by people who could actually show their own work without hesitation.

Five Things to Verify Before You Enroll

1. Search the reviews specifically. Use the search function in Google reviews. Type “areola,” “nipple,” “mastectomy,” “reconstruction.” Count how many results appear. Zero is an answer.

2. Look at the portfolio with fresh eyes. Is the work shown actually areola restoration on real post-surgical clients? Or is it illustrations, practice skin work, or cosmetic PMU?

3. Check what they talk about. What is the majority of their content about? If it is mostly cosmetic tattoo services with areola work sprinkled in, that is a cosmetic artist. If it is overwhelmingly clinical, paramedical, post-surgical — that is a specialist.

4. Verify any awards or credentials they claim. Can you find the awarding organization? Can you verify the award was given? A British Aesthetics Award is findable. A self-printed certificate is not the same thing.

5. Ask directly about case volume. How many 3D areola restoration procedures have you personally performed on real post-surgical clients? The answer matters. Dozens is not enough. Hundreds is where real clinical depth begins.

About the Author

Bianca Cypser is the founder of the International Institute of Medical Tattoo Science and Artistry and Imagine You New Medical Spa in St. Petersburg, Florida. A licensed esthetician and certified medical tattoo artist with 20 years of active clinical experience, she has performed over 500 paramedical tattoo procedures including 3D areola restoration, scar camouflage, and stretch mark camouflage. She trains paramedical tattoo artists in small private classes of 1–3 students with year-long post-training mentorship support. Plastic surgeons refer their patients to her. Some have trained with her.

Related Topics / Keywords

3D areola restoration training • areola tattoo trainer reviews • how to choose areola tattoo trainer • areola tattoo training Florida • paramedical tattoo training Florida • areola tattoo certification Florida • areola tattoo trainer portfolio • nipple tattoo trainer credentials • best areola tattoo training USA • 3D areola nipple restoration training • breast cancer survivors areola tattoo training • mastectomy tattoo training • paramedical tattoo certification Florida • areola tattoo trainer red flags • how to verify areola tattoo trainer • Gemma Bowers areola tattoo • Tata Foundation areola tattoo • medical tattoo artist UK • areola tattoo trainer no portfolio • post-surgical areola tattoo training​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​